Home Page > Supplementary Information > Junction Signalling
This page presents an overview of junction signalling in Britain and its evolution from the days of mechanical signalling. The purpose of junction signalling is to inform the driver approaching a junction which route the train will take. Using this information, the driver can regulate the train's speed as necessary to safely negotiate a diverging route. Drivers must learn the permissible speed of each route as part of their route knowledge, which is supplemented by lineside speed signs. This is the basis of 'route signalling', as distinct from 'speed signalling' in which the signal aspect tells the driver the permissible speed, without specifying the actual route. Route signalling is characteristic of British railways, whereas most countries around the world now use speed signalling.
In addition to controlling the train's speed, some forms of junction signalling can help prevent mis-routeing by conveying routeing information to the driver early enough for the train to be stopped before the junction if an incorrect route has been set.
Note: All the diagrams on this page illustrate a scenario where a train is being signalled through a left-hand divergence and assume that the line is clear throughout and all signals are showing the least restrictive aspect possible in the circumstances. Under less favourable conditions, drivers may encounter signal aspects more restrictive than those illustrated.
The provision of splitting distant signals was a requirement of the Board of Trade until 1914. A semaphore splitting distant signal has multiple arms arranged in a similar configuration to the junction signal itself. This gives the driver information about the junction ahead in a complete and unambiguous way and allows a normal aspect sequence to be maintained through the junction. Since the splitting distant signal is located at full braking distance from the junction signal, the driver of a wrongly-routed train has the opportunity to stop before the junction. Disadvantages of splitting distant signals are that they are expensive to install and can be difficult to sight.
|Fig. 1: Semaphore Signalling with Splitting Distant Signal.|
Where a splitting distant signal is not provided, the distant signal is maintained at 'caution' when a diverging route is set. An approaching driver has to start braking because the distant signal being at 'caution' could otherwise mean that the Home signal (which might be before the junction signal) is at 'danger'. On seeing that the junction signal is 'off', the driver can regulate the speed of the train for the divergence. In some cases, the lack of a splitting distant signal could be unduly restrictive.
|Fig. 2: Semaphore Signalling without Splitting Distant Signal.|
The earliest colour light signalling installations merely perpetuated the junction signalling practices associated with semaphore signalling. Colour light junction signals and splitting distant signals had multiple signal heads instead of arms. The signal heads were positioned side by side and stepped in height in the same manner as semaphore arms.
|Fig. 3: Colour Light Junction Signal with Multiple Heads.|
Multiple signal heads on junction signals had the undesirable effect of compelling drivers to pass red lights in the normal course of running. The use of a route indicator in conjunction with a single signal head avoided this problem, but the low readability of alphanumeric route indicators makes them unsuitable for high speed applications. The development of the junction indicator in the 1930s made available a form of route indicator that was readable from much greater distances. Splitting distant signals continued to be installed as necessary to give drivers prior warning of the diverging route.
|Fig. 4: Colour Light Junction Signal with Junction Indicator.|
If the speed of the diverging route is equal or close to that of the straight route, an unrestricted aspect sequence can be given with no need for a splitting distant signal. The driver is able to reduce speed for the divergence (if necessary) upon sighting the illuminated junction indicator.
|Fig. 5: Junction Signalling with Unrestricted Aspect Sequence.|
Reduction in speed for a diverging route can be enforced through the application of signalling controls. 'Approach release from red' holds the junction signal at a red aspect (without junction indication) until the train is close to it, even though the signalman had set the route through the junction. This has the effect of presenting the driver with an ordinary cautionary aspect sequence on the approach to the junction. The driver has to start a brake application sufficient to be able to stop at the junction signal, which will automatically clear to a 'proceed' aspect with junction indication as the train approaches. This form of junction signalling avoids the use of a splitting distant signal but can be too restrictive for higher speed junctions. The 'straight' (i.e. highest speed) route is not approach released and an unrestricted aspect sequence can be displayed.
In early installations, the aspect of the junction signal was released when the train's speed had been reduced to the speed of the divergence. Later installations allowed the aspect to be released as soon as the signal and junction indicator were both visible and readable. Although the train may not yet have decelerated to the speed of the divergence, the driver could see the route indicator and would continue braking. Before 1987, it was practice to restrict the aspect to single yellow until the train had passed the AWS magnet, so that a 'warning' indication would always be received in the cab for the diverging route, even if the signals ahead were 'clear'. Current practice is to release the aspect straight to green as soon as the signal and junction indicator are both visible and readable.
|Fig. 6: Approach Release from Red.|
For divergences with a higher permissible speed, approach release from red can be too restrictive. An improvement can be made by approach releasing the junction signal from a yellow aspect rather than red. This is now referred to as 'free yellow'. Free yellow can only be used with a four-aspect sequence, i.e. the signal in rear of the junction signal must be capable of displaying a double yellow aspect. This is to ensure that a driver being routed over the divergence will have passed a signal displaying a cautionary aspect and therefore would have started braking.
|Fig. 7: Free Yellow.|
The superior braking performance of the Class 253 & 254 'High Speed Trains', introduced in 1976, meant they could begin braking later after passing a double yellow aspect. This highlighted a problem with the 'free yellow' form of junction signalling. Drivers of High Speed Trains, having passed the double yellow aspect and thinking they were braking to stop at a red aspect two signals ahead, could suddenly be confronted with a junction signal set for the diverging route and have to brake hard to take the divergence at the correct speed. To remedy this, new flashing yellow signal aspects were introduced from 1979 to give the driver a positive indication that a diverging route was set at the junction ahead. The signal in rear of the junction signal displays a flashing single yellow aspect, meaning that the junction signal is showing a 'proceed' aspect applicable to a diverging route. In four-aspect territory, a flashing single yellow is normally preceded by a flashing double yellow aspect to present a consistent sequence.
Before 1987, it was practice to restrict the junction signal's aspect to single yellow (or double yellow where that would be too restrictive) until the train had passed the AWS magnet, so that a 'warning' indication would always be received in the cab for the diverging route. Under certain circumstances it will be necessary to revert to approach release from red. Where there is more than one diverging route, the flashing yellow aspects only apply to those with the highest permissible speed. Provision of new splitting distant signals ceased upon the introduction of flashing yellow aspects but this was subsequently reversed.
|Fig. 8: Approach Release from Yellow with Flashing Aspects in rear.|
As new junction layouts that permitted very high turnout speeds were being installed, for which flashing yellow aspects would be too restrictive, the splitting distant signal was reintroduced to colour light junction signalling practice in 1992. In three-aspect territory, the splitting distant signal is located at full braking distance from the junction signal. It follows therefore that there must be ample distance for a train to decelerate to the speed of the divergence and additionally, any train that is wrongly routed will be able to stop before the junction. Further consideration must be given to splitting distant signals in four-aspect territory, where the same does not apply. If the splitting distant is too near the junction to allow the train to decelerate to the speed of the divergence, the next signal in rear must be restricted to a double yellow aspect for the diverging route. The reintroduction of splitting distant signals included provision for a 'preliminary route indicator' (PRI) to be used in four-aspect territory. A PRI would only be provided where early routeing information was needed to prevent mis-routeing.
|Fig. 9: Splitting Distant Signal and Preliminary Route Indicator.|
Revised principles of 1996 did away with the PRI and replaced it with the 'outer splitting distant signal'. As with the PRI, this only applies in four-aspect territory. The signal in rear of a splitting distant may be equipped as an outer splitting distant signal where routeing information needs to be given earlier than at the 'inner' splitting distant, either to prevent mis-routeing or to ensure that the diverging route is taken at a safe speed.
|Fig. 10: Outer and Inner Splitting Distant Signals.|
Preliminary route indicators returned in 2002. Rather than being associated with splitting distant signals (where the outer splitting distant has rendered them unnecessary), these later installations are used in conjunction with free yellow, flashing yellow aspects, or at junctions with an unrestricted aspect sequence. The PRIs supplement a compliant junction signalling arrangement, giving advance routeing information so that mis-routeing can be avoided. One or two PRIs may be provided as required in the circumstances.
|Fig. 11: Preliminary Route Indicators.|